>
"We did a strategic plan two years ago. I couldn't tell you what's in it, and neither could my team."
You did the offsite. Someone facilitated. There is a document. And the honest truth is that it changed almost nothing, because the room reached for solutions before it told itself the truth.
Most strategic planning reaches for solutions before the room has told itself the truth. We facilitate discernment instead — guardrails first, then unfiltered reality, then patterns, and only then direction. It's harder to sit in and it produces convictions that outlive the document.
Non-negotiables named as guardrails rather than strategy, and your theory of change re-anchored with its assumptions surfaced.
Unfiltered field reality, appreciative inquiry on when the work is at its best, then patterns — with solutions deliberately forbidden until the room has heard itself.
Four to six directional convictions, stress-tested against governance and policy, with a stop / start / pilot / study list and named owners.
A direction your leadership team can state from memory, defend to a funder, and test decisions against for the next fifteen years.
Six minutes, free, and you keep the results either way.